Author: lemirejeanluc

Teaching Reflections

Students learn in many ways. Among them are the following:

  • Concentrating.
  • Practicing.
  • Relating new information to information they already know.
  • Observation and imitation.
  • By making mistakes (the hard way).
  • Sudden revelation.

To facilitate such learning, I have considered the following options:

  • Give students engaging activities that require them to learn.
  • Demonstrate/model the skill for students so they can imitate it.
  • Ask students to reflect on their challenges and successes so they can improve on it next time.
  • Put students “in charge” in a limited capacity, so they feel the pressure of performing for their peers rather than just the instructor.

The following are a few goals that come to mind upon considering the expectations I have for myself as a teacher in the classroom:

  • Students achieve course objectives.
  • Students improve English skills in the manner outlined in the course objectives.
  • Students learn to speak and write better.
  • Students improve grammar.
  • Students become comfortable using more advanced English than they were comfortable using prior to the course. 
  • Students have opportunities to practice their skills in “real world” scenarios.

When I reflect upon the ways that keep class interesting, the following comes to mind:

  • I use activities because feedback I have received from students suggests that activities, for example online vocabulary games, increase class engagement.
  • I believe giving students tasks that demand language skills rather than using simple worksheets encourages more learning by imposing social pressures of performing within a group.
  • I use vocabulary games, such as Pictionary (wherein students draws vocabulary words while others compete to guess the correct answer), matching exercises (wherein students match vocabulary words to their correct definitions) and cloze exercises (wherein students are shown excerpts from class readings and asked to fill in the missing vocabulary words), as a fun warm-up that also reinforces vocabulary from previous lessons. These activities are also useful because they provide an opportunity to informally assess student comprehension.

Some students will meet every goal, but others will not; however, most students will make progress toward most them. I will continue to research teaching techniques and enroll in courses relevant to my English-teaching career. I will compare student outcomes with the objectives of the course and use experimentation as well as academic literature to develop my approach.

Teaching Reflection – February 24th, 2021

Like all our lessons, my teaching partner and I delivered this lesson online using the video-conferencing service called Big Blue Button. For our first activity, we decided to use the whiteboard function to facilitate a game of Pictionary with the students. We directly messaged students with a vocabulary words related to the short stories we had previously examined; then students used the multi-user whiteboard to draw a picture of that item or concept while other students competed to guess the correct answer first. Students enjoyed drawing on the multi-user whiteboard, and I believe students enjoyed watching their classmates draw as well.

Next my partner and I read a new short story to the students. When we read through this story, we didn’t linger for too long or take breaks to discuss passages. We thought that this might make the narrative feel smoother and more cohesive, but we ended up finishing ahead of schedule and sent students for an early break.

The second “half” of the lesson began early as well; however, my partner and I found that the rest of our exercises still filled the time well. We decided that we should postpone the break until after the next activity if we find ourselves ahead of schedule again. This would give students a predictable schedule that they can easily plan activities around.

After the break students performed another matching exercise and then went to breakout rooms to answer questions from a worksheet provided by our practicum sponsor prior to the lesson. This time, we instructed students to choose a leader to speak on behalf of their group, this worked well as the leader of each group felt accountable and thus ensured that productive discussion took place.

Teaching Reflection – February 10th, 2021

This was the second lesson that my partner and I prepared for our class. In this class we revisited the same short story that we read to the students in our first lesson. We had the class play Never Have I Ever, a game wherein players try to identify things they have not done which others have, as a warmup activity. Never Have I Ever worked well because it was familiar to most students and gave students a chance to reflect on and share their unique experiences.

Our next activity was a vocabulary matching exercise. We used vocabulary words that students flagged for us in our previous lesson, for it was our belief that a second encounter with those words would strengthen their comprehension of them. Furthermore, because students had previously identified as difficult those particular words, it was the belief of my partner and me that those words would be the most relevant ones to review. We used the “multi-user whiteboard” feature that is available through Big Blue Button, the online video calling service we used for teaching, and instructed students to draw lines from each vocabulary word to the correct definition. It has been my experience (from the perspective of both the student and the teacher) that students enjoy using the interactive whiteboard, and that was the case this time as well.

Next, we split students into groups to work in breakout rooms and scan the short story for answers to questions that we displayed on screen. My partner and I each entered a room to facilitate discussion, and it was noted that in the future it would make more sense to leave students mostly by themselves while in breakout groups to encourage student-centered learning. Our practicum sponsor suggested after the class that we instruct groups of students to choose a leader to facilitate discussion both to give students the opportunity to build their leadership skills and to ensure that group discussions are productive.

The next activity was a fill-in-the-blanks or “cloze” exercise. My partner and I used quotes containing the same vocabulary words that we used in the matching exercise. We did this because we thought further repetition would solidify the students’ comprehension further. Students displayed their comprehension by accurately filling in the blanks.

Next was another breakout session. This time, students worked in groups to answer questions on a worksheet (provided to us prior to the lesson) regarding their understanding of the story. Upon returning to the main room, students shared their answers and with the rest of the class, which allowed other groups to benefit from the insights of their peers and challenged students to speak semi-publicly.

Teaching Reflection – February 3rd, 2021

This was the second lesson that my partner and I delivered to our group of students. Our class consisted of a warm-up activity, a reading, a discussion, and an “exit ticket” activity. We used an exercise known as a word ladder as our warmup activity. For the word ladder, we put students into groups and gave each group a starting word and an ending word; then we asked them to change the starting word repeatedly, replacing one letter at a time while ensuring the new word created was a real word, until they reached the ending word. We then asked students to tell the class which words they created while working toward the ending word. Students seemed moderately engaged by the activity, and I enjoyed it as well.

Next my partner and I read a short story aloud to the class, switching back and forth between paragraph breaks. We also used this time to ask students if they had questions about any unknown vocabulary words, of which we took note for later classes, and discussed aspects of the characterization and plot as they emerged during the reading

After completing the story, my teaching partner and I led a class discussion surrounding characterization within the story. Students participated in the discussion, and it was noted that putting students into breakout rooms may have encouraged more student-led discussion.

Teaching Reflection – January 25th, 2021

This was the first lesson that my partner and I taught, and our only objective was to have the class do some activities that encouraged discussion. This lesson began with a warmup: a game called Two Truths and a Lie. Students took turns stating two truths and one lie, and other students guessed which statement was a lie. This game was fun for two reasons. Firstly, it is challenging to come up with convincing lies about oneself. Secondly, it is challenging to identify truths about oneself that seem worth sharing. Furthermore, this activity gave students a chance to bond while sharing interesting details of their lives.

In the next portion of our lesson my partner and I displayed six quotes and asked students to choose the quote which resonated with them most. We included quotes from Abe Lincoln, C.S. Lewis, Gandhi, Lao Tzu, Margaret Fuller, and a Chinese proverb. When students had finished choosing their preferred quote, we asked them to explain what about that quote resonated with them, which worked well to give students an opportunity to speak but ended up being teacher-centered in that students would address my partner and I when answering questions rather than the rest of the class. In the future I would like to encourage students to “pass the microphone” to the next student rather than acting as the sole facilitators of the discussion.

Our next exercise was a classic: the old “what three items would you bring to a deserted island?” dilemma. For this exercise, we split students into breakout rooms and asked them to deliberate until they all agreed on three items. Upon returning to the main room, we asked each group to share the items they agreed on as well as to explain the rationale behind their decisions.

Next were a listening exercise, wherein students listened to audio recordings and answered corresponding comprehension questions on esl-lab.com. Then we reviewed the answers as a group.

As a final “exit ticket” we asked students to state something they learned about a classmate during the lesson. This gave them an opportunity to practice speaking as well as to display their knew knowledge about their peers.

Reflection: Observation of TRU Conversation Club

For this reflection I observed a meeting of the Conversation Club on January 27, 2021. One of the first activities was a fill-in-the-blank exercise, but I noticed that when the instructor offered students to volunteer an answer, the students didn’t seem keen to participate. However, the fill-in-the-blank exercise did a good job at promoting specific answers from the students. Because the questions were not open-ended, students were restricted to a specific range of responses that challenged them. The instructor was able to successfully get students to participate in the fill-in-the-blank exercise both by gently encouraging the group to respond voluntarily and by calling on individual students to participate. As each student provided their response, the professor used it as an opportunity to start conversations with them and encourage them to speak more in the dialogue. The next exercise involved the interactive whiteboard. The instructor displayed an image of a circle and asked students to mark their hover their cursor in a position around the circumference. Then, the instructor moved clockwise around the circle asking each student to utter a phrase in the style of “I like [X], how about you, [classmate]?” We went around the circle twice, giving students multiple occasions to come up with new questions. Students were more willing to participate in this exercise as well, as I think the circular order made their participation feel inevitable rather than optional.

Reflection: Observation of Online Video Resource Portraying English as a Foreign Language Class in Korea

For this reflection I observed an online video resource demonstrating an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) class recorded in Korean classroom.  That which most stood out to me was the rapid rate of speed at which the instructor delivered his lesson. It was clear the students were used to the routine as the instructor moved briskly through different stages of the activity. First the students listened to a pre-recorded dialogue, then the instructor re-read the dialogue to them. After that, the instructor began engaging individual students, asking them to perform the dialogue with him. Another highlight of this observation was the seamless transitions between the native English speaker and the Korean instructor. They had the air of stage actors delivering a well-known, well-rehearsed performance. I was impressed by this, but I think I would hate it. It seemed clear that they were completely embedded within the structure of the lesson, like robots or something. The students seemed comfortable with this format, though, and in unison would chant correct responses to the queries of the instructors. The reason I find this unappealing is, on one hand, because it seems like too much work from an entry-level perspective. Personally, I am not thrilled at the prospect of rehearsing lessons and practicing lines so I can deliver mechanical lessons at breakneck speed. Students seemed to thoroughly enjoy the English song they listened to as part of their exercises. I was impressed with the courage of the English instructor when he sung the song to the children even though he cannot sing. After singing the song, the students were asked to sing along with the instructor. I think the use of songs within the lesson is very useful as melodies are inherently memorable—they get “stuck in your head,” as it were—meaning that the associated lyrics are likely to be more memorable as well.

Reflection: Communicative Approach Online Video Teaching Observation

For this reflection I refer to an online video resource surrounding the communicative approach. In the lesson, the instructor taught students how to build convincing arguments. The style of the instructor was “communicative” in that the bulk of the class consisted of him speaking directly with the students, both one-on-one and as a group. The instructor also had the class work in groups for a role-playing activity wherein each student played the part of a person trying to convince someone of something. This gave them an opportunity to practice structuring their arguments in the manner that the instructor laid out in the beginning of the lesson. The students seemed to adopt their roles naturally, and they were able to articulate succinct arguments in favor of living in either the city, the country, or a small town. This worked well as a topic because each student had genuine opinions which they were eager to express. The fact that students came from different ethnic and linguistic backgrounds encouraged them to speak in English, for it was the common language in which they could all communicate. After the group exercise the instructor called on individual students to make a case for their preferred location, and he used it as an opportunity to ask follow-up questions and assist students with challenging vocabulary. The choice to center the arguments around preferred locations was appropriate because it is a common subject of conversation which students are likely to encounter from day-to-day. For the homework assignment, students were asked to compose an argumentative piece of writing in the format that they practiced verbally that day. This gives students a natural opportunity to review the material they have already learned, which helps to solidify those concepts for maximal future benefit.

Reflection: Observation of EASL Conversation Club

I observed the TRU conversation club on January 25th. It was a lot of fun. It was also a good learning experience to see how the instructor led the students through conversations and dealt with challenges. The instructor centered the conversation around Friends, a popular American situational comedy from the 1990’s. Friends was a great topic for engaging the students because it has a huge international audience. It is also an appropriate topic because, at least in my experience, many people naturally enjoy talking about their favourite TV shows and characters, so it is the kind of conversation that will likely have in their day-to-day lives. The main exercise was a discussion about the different characters of the show. Students were asked one by one to describe each character, and the instructor engaged each one in a dialogue, encouraging them to expand and assisting them with vocabulary where needed. The character discussion challenged students to generate a lot of varied language to capture the disparities among the characters. One challenge, which I think is most common in the online environment but likely occurs in the classroom as well, was that some students were reluctant to speak. In most cases, the instructor was able to gently encourage them to turn their microphones on. Students also spoke at different levels within the class, and the instructor was able to successfully adjust her approach depending on the needs of the individual student with whom she was working.